We benchmark Yin-Net’s UK ISP product, strictly positioned as an exit node relay. This setup is one of the more satisfying UK residential buffers tested.
Network Quality
Unicom direct connects borderline passable; Telecom/Mobile absolutely unusable in direct configs. Relays strongly recommended. Speeds up to 500Mbps+ easily achievable over NL/UK/DE buffers.
IP Quality
IP hygiene aggregates good metrics: unlocks mainstream streaming (Meta/Gemini detoured). Most databases tag it with residential flags. A rigid choice given sparse UK residential supplies.
Hardware Performance
Hearty CPU cycles, but DISK IO levels flatline heavily. Test scripts stuttered during execution. Avoid heavy deployments.
Configuration 2:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
UK Dual ISP | VPS ②
CPU: 2 cores
Memory: 2GB
Disk: 20GB
Bandwidth: 600Mbps
Traffic: 2000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 (dual ISP)
DDoS protection: None
Routing: International
OS options: Linux
USD 14/month
Copy
|
Configuration 1:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
UK Dual ISP | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 500Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 (dual ISP)
DDoS protection: None
Routing: International
OS options: Linux
USD 10/month
Copy
|
Although the IP quality isn’t perfect, considering the price, with 30% or 50% off promos this UK pseudo-residential can be as low as USD 5/month, which is solid for the money. They tested another WisdomCloud range long ago and it performed poorly; this newer range is much better and worth considering if you need it.
Network Quality#
Off-peak IPv4 return-path test
Network quality test script result image
Peak-hours IPv4 return-path test
Network quality test script result image
Our network probing tool result image
Off-peak ITDOG forward-path test
ITDOG test result image
Peak-hours ITDOG forward-path test
ITDOG test result image
Global major sites connectivity test
Our Tcpping international connectivity test result image
Peak-hours Guangzhou Telecom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 193 received, 3.5% packet loss, time 199215ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 234.902/239.487/244.904/3.791 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 80.8 MBytes 67.7 Mbits/sec 6 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 80.5 MBytes 65.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 785 KBytes 627 Kbits/sec 24 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 543 KBytes 445 Kbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Peak-hours Guangzhou Unicom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 200 received, 0% packet loss, time 199102ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 189.437/189.665/191.275/0.172 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 85.8 MBytes 71.9 Mbits/sec 20 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.24 sec 85.7 MBytes 70.2 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 114 MBytes 93.7 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Peak-hours Guangzhou Mobile (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 172 received, 14% packet loss, time 199724ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 182.556/222.178/268.450/27.468 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 99.5 MBytes 83.5 Mbits/sec 9 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.18 sec 98.0 MBytes 80.8 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.18 sec 272 KBytes 218 Kbits/sec 27 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 184 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Peak-hours Shenzhen Telecom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
429 packets transmitted, 398 received, 7.22611% packet loss, time 428838ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 271.925/272.389/276.442/0.374 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 65.0 MBytes 54.5 Mbits/sec 724 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 64.6 MBytes 52.8 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.27 sec 386 KBytes 308 Kbits/sec 22 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 250 KBytes 205 Kbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Peak-hours Jinan Unicom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
418 packets transmitted, 416 received, 0.478469% packet loss, time 417538ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 157.607/158.130/170.458/1.292 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 84.0 MBytes 70.5 Mbits/sec 7 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.17 sec 82.3 MBytes 67.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 60.1 MBytes 49.2 Mbits/sec 880 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 57.0 MBytes 47.8 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Peak-hours Mobile (1000Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
425 packets transmitted, 418 received, 1.64706% packet loss, time 424715ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 192.333/254.478/353.309/37.621 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 24.3 MBytes 20.4 Mbits/sec 3 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.26 sec 22.2 MBytes 18.1 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.23 sec 7.52 MBytes 6.16 Mbits/sec 24 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 6.59 MBytes 5.53 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
BWH.NL -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
439 packets transmitted, 439 received, 0% packet loss, time 438754ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.508/7.858/44.197/1.792 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 679 MBytes 570 Mbits/sec 30 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 677 MBytes 567 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 776 MBytes 650 Mbits/sec 436 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 773 MBytes 648 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Nube.DE optimized -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
520 packets transmitted, 520 received, 0% packet loss, time 519706ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.215/12.549/22.582/0.658 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 637 MBytes 534 Mbits/sec 23 sender
[ 5] 0.00-9.24 sec 621 MBytes 564 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-9.24 sec 705 MBytes 640 Mbits/sec 7708 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 702 MBytes 589 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
IP Quality#
IPv4 Quality
IP quality test script result image
Our IP quality lookup tool result image
IPlark test result
IPlark test result image
Streaming Unlocks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
Test time: 2026-03-11 11:38:11
IPV4:
============[ Global platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: GBR)
BingSearch YES (Region: GB)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: GB)
Disney+ YES (Region: GB)
Gemini NO
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: GB)
IQiYi YES (Region: GB)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA YES
MetaAI Unknown: unexpected response: ajax status=401, home status=403
Netflix YES (Region: GB)
Netflix CDN US
OneTrust YES (Region: GB ENGLAND)
ChatGPT YES (Region: GB)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: GB)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv YES (Region: GB)
Sora YES (Region: GB)
Spotify Registration NO
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: GB)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: GB)
TikTok YES (Region: GB)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: GB)
YouTube CDN IAD
Copy
|
Common IP Databases Results
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
Data is for reference only and is not 100% accurate. If it differs from reality, manually check multiple databases for comparison.
Below are the database IDs; the output includes the corresponding source IDs.
ipinfodatabase [0] | scamalyticsdatabase [1] | virustotaldatabase [2] | abuseipdbdatabase [3] | ip2locationdatabase [4]
ip-apidatabase [5] | ipwhoisdatabase [6] | ipregistrydatabase [7] | ipdatadatabase [8] | db-ipdatabase [9]
ipapiisdatabase [A] | ipapicomdatabase [B] | bigdataclouddatabase [C] | dklydatabase [D] | ipqualityscoredatabase [E]
ipinteldatabase [F] | ipfighterdatabase [G] | fraudlogixdatabase [H] | cloudflaredatabase [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust score (higher is better): 100 [8]
VPN score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Proxy score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Fraud score (lower is better): 65 [E]
Abuse score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse score (lower is better): 0.0017 (Low) [A]
Company abuse score (lower is better): 0.001 (Low) [A]
Threat level: low [9 B]
Traffic share: Human (higher is better)69% [I] Bot (lower is better)30% [I]
Blacklist record stats: (how many blacklist sites have a record):
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No records: 94 [2]
Security Info:
Usage type: isp [0 3 7 A] internet_backbone [8] business [9] unknown [C]
Company type: isp [0 7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream63% Other36% [I]
Device type: Desktop68% Mobile31% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream76% Other23% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7 D]
Datacenter: No [0 5 8 A C G]
Mobile device: Yes [E] No [5 A C G]
Proxy: No [0 4 5 7 8 9 A B C D] Yes [E G]
VPN: No [0 7 A C D G] Yes [E]
Tor exit: No [7 D]
Tor exit: No [7 D]
Crawler: No [9 A B E]
Anonymous: No [7 8 D]
Attacker: No [7 8 D]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
Threat: No [7 8 C D]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C D]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C D]
Bot: No [E]
DNS blacklist: 309(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 23(Other)
Google search viability:NO
------------Mail port check--based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
|
---------------------Basic info--thanks to all open source projects----------------------
CPU model : Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
CPU cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2095.076 MHz
CPU cache : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 8.00 MB / L3: 32.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Memory : 266.11 MiB / 1.89 GiB
Swap : 2.27 MiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk space : 2.51 GiB / 19.82 GiB
Boot disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 30 min
Load : 0.60, 0.27, 0.27
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) (x86_64)
Architecture : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
TCP congestion control : cubic
Virtualization : KVM
NAT type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS3257 GTT Communications Inc.
IPv4 location : London / England / GB
------------------------CPU test--via sysbench-------------------------
-> CPU test running (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread test (single core) score: 996 Scores
2 Thread test (multi-core) score: 2001 Scores
--------------------Memory test--thanks to lemonbench----------------------------
-> Memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single-thread read: 20606.03 MB/s
Single-thread write: 17471.32 MB/s
--------------------Disk dd read/write test--thanks to lemonbench--------------------
-> Disk IO test running (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Test operation Write speed Read speed
100MB-4K Block 12.4 MB/s (3029 IOPS, 8.45s) 12.4 MB/s (3034 IOPS, 8.44s)
1GB-1M Block 309 MB/s (294 IOPS, 3.40s) 308 MB/s (293 IOPS, 3.40s)
----------------------Disk fio read/write test--thanks to yabs-----------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.02 MB/s (3.0k) | 192.49 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.02 MB/s (3.0k) | 193.50 MB/s (3.0k)
Total | 24.04 MB/s (6.0k) | 386.00 MB/s (6.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 282.04 MB/s (550) | 278.82 MB/s (272)
Write | 297.03 MB/s (580) | 297.39 MB/s (290)
Total | 579.08 MB/s (1.1k) | 576.21 MB/s (562)
Copy
|
