We benchmark Yin-Net’s France ISP product, strictly positioned as an exit node relay. France ISP setups are extremely rare, giving users rich choices.
Network Quality
Unicom direct connects borderline passable; Telecom/Mobile absolutely unusable in direct configs. Relays strongly recommended. Speeds up to 500Mbps+ easily achievable over NL/UK/DE buffers.
IP Quality
IP hygiene aggregates average metrics: native + residential tags in some databases, but carries VPN flag triggers. Basic streaming unlocks hold rigid (Meta/Gemini detoured).
Hardware Performance
Hearty CPU cycles, but DISK IO levels flatline heavily. Test scripts stuttered during execution. Avoid heavy deployments.
Configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
France Dual ISP | VPS
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 500Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 (dual ISP)
DDoS protection: None
Routing: International
OS options: Linux
USD 12/month. Better value with 30% or 50% off promo codes.
Copy
|
Although the IP isn’t as good as expected, native France IPs and pseudo-residential options are still limited; this is worth considering.
Network Quality#
Off-peak IPv4 return-path test
Network quality test script result image
Peak-hours IPv4 return-path test
Network quality test script result image
Our network probing tool result image
Off-peak ITDOG forward-path test
ITDOG test result image
Global major sites connectivity test
Our Tcpping international connectivity test result image
Off-peak Guangzhou Telecom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 177 received, 11.5% packet loss, time 199448ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 241.920/242.182/243.043/0.124 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 97.4 MBytes 81.7 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 96.4 MBytes 79.0 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 26.2 MBytes 21.5 Mbits/sec 1728 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 23.6 MBytes 19.8 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Off-peak Guangzhou Unicom (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 200 received, 0% packet loss, time 199047ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 261.141/266.047/288.623/4.715 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 75.2 MBytes 63.1 Mbits/sec 5 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.25 sec 72.6 MBytes 59.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.24 sec 89.2 MBytes 73.1 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 86.1 MBytes 72.3 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Off-peak Guangzhou Mobile (500Mbps) -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
200 packets transmitted, 174 received, 13% packet loss, time 199579ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 237.712/258.907/271.472/3.587 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 91.1 MBytes 76.4 Mbits/sec 1 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.26 sec 90.8 MBytes 74.2 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.26 sec 479 KBytes 383 Kbits/sec 38 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 230 KBytes 189 Kbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
BWH.NL -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
550 packets transmitted, 550 received, 0% packet loss, time 549924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.576/9.768/10.872/0.110 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 567 MBytes 475 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 564 MBytes 473 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 657 MBytes 550 Mbits/sec 35803 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 653 MBytes 548 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Nube.DE optimized -> destination machine IPERF3 single-thread test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
556 packets transmitted, 556 received, 0% packet loss, time 554446ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10.978/11.198/12.353/0.109 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 532 MBytes 446 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-9.24 sec 521 MBytes 472 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-9.24 sec 611 MBytes 554 Mbits/sec 31581 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 607 MBytes 509 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
IP Quality#
IPv4 Quality
IP quality test script result image
Our IP quality lookup tool result image
IPlark test result
IPlark test result image
Streaming Unlocks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
Test time: 2026-03-14 06:24:29
IPV4:
============[ Global platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: FRA)
BingSearch YES (Region: FR)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: FR)
Disney+ YES (Region: FR)
Gemini NO
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: GB)
IQiYi YES (Region: FR)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA YES
MetaAI Unknown: unexpected response: ajax status=401, home status=403
Netflix YES (Region: FR)
Netflix CDN US
OneTrust YES (Region: FR ÎLE-DE-FRANCE)
ChatGPT YES (Region: FR)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: FR)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv YES (Region: FR)
Sora YES (Region: FR)
Spotify Registration NO
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: FR)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: FR)
TikTok YES (Region: FR)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: GB)
YouTube CDN pniada - AS
Copy
|
Common IP Databases Results
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
Data is for reference only and is not 100% accurate. If it differs from reality, manually check multiple databases for comparison.
Below are the database IDs; the output includes the corresponding source IDs.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust score (higher is better): 94 [8]
VPN score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Proxy score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat score (lower is better): 18 [8]
Fraud score (lower is better): 89 [E]
Abuse score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASN abuse score (lower is better): 0.0008 (Low) [A]
Company abuse score (lower is better): 0 (Very Low) [A]
Threat level: low [9 B]
Traffic share: Human (higher is better) 19% [I] Bot (lower is better) 80% [I]
Blacklist record stats: (how many blacklist sites have a record):
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No records: 94 [2]
Security Info:
Usage type: unknown [C] isp [0 3 7] business [9] hosting [8 A]
Company type: isp [0 A] business [7]
Browser type: Mainstream 82% Other 17% [I]
Device type: Desktop 81% Mobile 18% Other 0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream 96% Other 3% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7 D]
Datacenter: No [0 5 C G] Yes [8 A]
Mobile device: No [5 A C G] Yes [E]
Proxy: Yes [E G] No [0 4 5 7 8 9 A B C D]
VPN: No [0 A C E G] Yes [7 D]
Tor exit: No [7 D]
Tor exit (alt source): No [7 D]
Crawler: No [9 A B E]
Anonymous: Yes [7 D] No [8]
Attacker: No [7 8 D]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C D] Yes [E]
Threat: No [7 8 C D]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C D]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C D]
Bot: Yes [E]
DNS blacklist: 309(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 7(Blacklisted) 24(Other)
Google search viability: NO
------------Mail port check--based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
---------------------Basic info--thanks to all open source projects----------------------
CPU model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2599.996 MHz
CPU cache : L1: 32.00 KB / L2: 4.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Memory : 212.91 MiB / 926.16 MiB
Swap : 5.72 MiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk space : 2.45 GiB / 9.82 GiB
Boot disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 18 hour 33 min
Load : 0.99, 0.24, 0.08
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) (x86_64)
Architecture : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
TCP congestion control : cubic
Virtualization : KVM
NAT type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS197537 WISDOM CLOUD INTERNET TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD.
IPv4 location : Paris / Île-de-France / FR
------------------------CPU test--via sysbench-------------------------
-> CPU test running (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread test (single core) score: 1013 Scores
--------------------Memory test--thanks to lemonbench----------------------------
-> Memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single-thread read: 20853.06 MB/s
Single-thread write: 16683.67 MB/s
--------------------Disk dd read/write test--thanks to lemonbench--------------------
-> Disk IO test running (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Test operation Write speed Read speed
100MB-4K Block 12.4 MB/s (3033 IOPS, 8.44s) 12.4 MB/s (3035 IOPS, 8.43s)
1GB-1M Block 309 MB/s (294 IOPS, 3.40s) 309 MB/s (294 IOPS, 3.39s)
----------------------Disk fio read/write test--thanks to yabs-----------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.03 MB/s (3.0k) | 192.77 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.03 MB/s (3.0k) | 193.79 MB/s (3.0k)
Total | 24.07 MB/s (6.0k) | 386.57 MB/s (6.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 282.08 MB/s (550) | 278.71 MB/s (272)
Write | 297.07 MB/s (580) | 297.27 MB/s (290)
Total | 579.16 MB/s (1.1k) | 575.98 MB/s (562)
Copy
|
