Yinnet, a domestic provider centering budget unoptimized grids with dedicated residential or pseudo-residential IPs. Standard tiers hold average value, but perpetual promo buffers render rigid competitiveness.
We benchmark Yinnet’s complete lineup: Korea VPS, US Dual‑ISP VPS, Taiwan VPS, Vietnam VPS, Japan VPS, Hong Kong VPS. Vietnam and HK real residential setups are among the best value in their categories. Taiwan is currently one of the best-value TW route machines you can buy (upstream imcloud, excellent HK/TW interconnect; enthusiasts can consider it). The US lineup is a classic pseudo-residential product with decent post-discount value. Japan and Korea are quite weak: although they are native IP products, Korea’s interconnect is poor and hard to use; Japan has partial Japan-only streaming unlock failures (DMM and other platforms), plus geo‑routed-to‑CN/VPN tags. Overall, they are mediocre.
Pros:
- Perpetual Promos: Perpetual 30%/20% off promos; rigid 50% Black Friday sales.
- Real Residential: HK/VN real residential setups hold zero competition at this tier.
- Pseudo-residential products: US pseudo-residential value is decent.
- Dedicated IP: All machines feature dedicated IPs instead of NAT.
- Refund Policy: 1-day buffer for full refunds (to balance credit).
Cons:
- Frail Performance: Flat disk IO and average CPU cycles.
- Relays Mandatory: Requires exit/relay buffers unless you are on specific CM nodes.
- Some geo-routed to CN: some US/KR/JP IP ranges show “sent to CN” behavior.
- Low bandwidth: generally 100–200Mbps.
There are no bad products, only bad prices.
Refund Policy
1
2
|
Within one day of purchasing any Yinnet product, you can submit a ticket to the finance department for a no‑reason refund (refunds are credited to your Yinnet account balance; withdrawals incur a 10% processing fee). Any requests submitted via “Cancel Application” are not accepted. Each account and each payment account can use no‑reason refunds up to three times. Malicious refunds may result in account suspension. Special note: once balance is topped up, it cannot be refunded.
Copy
|
Some IP ranges (e.g., US/KR) show geo‑routed‑to‑CN behavior; some block MetaAI. See the detailed data below.
During the recent Black Friday sale (50% off site‑wide), value hit a new peak: $5/mo for HK true residential dedicated IP, $6/mo for Vietnam true residential, NTT/GTT pseudo‑residential at $3/mo, and TW interconnect as low as $5/mo. Especially for HK/Vietnam, there’s no competition at this price.
This post has no affiliate links. The merchant has permanent 30%/20% off codes; I’ve collected them and placed them in the default config at the start of each section for convenience.
Remember to enable BBR. With or without BBR, performance feels like two different machines.
Hong Kong#
HK true residential, upstream is HGC. It’s relatively niche, which keeps IP quality stable. At this price, the dedicated IP value is excellent. I initially thought it was a pseudo‑residential product, but it’s actually HGC. The only downside is the small port, but the traffic quota is reasonable for personal use. In the HK dedicated residential segment, it’s among the best.
Default configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
Hong Kong Dual-ISP | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 200Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 (Dual ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
$10.00 USD per month
With the 20% off code, it’s just $8/mo for a HK dedicated residential IP—nearly unbeatable, and monthly billing.
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Pure HGC residential, but ChatGPT/Gemini/Meta are blocked (HK doesn’t unlock them in general, unrelated to the IP itself). Most other services unlock fine—excellent HK residential IP overall.
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly an ISP/MOB residential product; HGC is indeed a HK residential ISP.
ipdata quality test image
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
Test time: 2025-12-04 23:34:28
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: HKG)
BingSearch YES (Region: HK)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: HK)
Disney+ YES (Region: HK)
Gemini NO
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: HK)
IQiYi YES (Region: HK)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA NO
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix YES (Region: HK)
Netflix CDN HK
OneTrust YES (Region: HK)
ChatGPT YES (Only Available with Mobile APP)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: HK)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv YES (Region: HK)
Sora Banned (VPN Blocked)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: HK)
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: HK)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: HK)
TikTok YES (Region: ALISG)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: HK)
YouTube CDN HKG
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: [ALISG]
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: HK)
Disney+: Yes (Region: HK)
Netflix: Yes (Region: HK)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: HK)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: HK)
TVBAnywhere+: No
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: HK)
OneTrust Region: HK [Unknown]
iQyi Oversea Region: HK
Bing Region: HK (Risky)
Apple Region: HK
YouTube CDN: Hong Kong
Netflix Preferred CDN: Hong Kong
ChatGPT: No (Only Available with Mobile APP)
Google Gemini: No
Claude: Unknown (https://claude.com/app-unavailable-in-region)
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Hong Kong
Google Search CAPTCHA Free:Yes
Steam Currency: HKD
---Forum---
Reddit: Failed (Error: )
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: Yes
=======================================
=============[ Hong Kong ]=============
Now E: Failed (Error: )
Viu.com: Yes (Region: HK)
Viu.TV: Yes
MyTVSuper: Yes
HBO Max: Yes (Region: HK)
SonyLiv: Yes (Region: HK)
BiliBili Hongkong/Macau/Taiwan: Yes
Bahamut Anime: Yes (Region: HK)
=======================================
Copy
|
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
-------------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck--------------
Data is for reference only and not 100% accurate. If it differs from real-world results, manually verify across multiple databases.
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 14 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 58 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 99 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.0003 (Very Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 (Very Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)81% [I] Bot (lower is better)18% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 95 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: business [9] unknown [C] isp [0 3 7 8 A]
Company Type: isp [0 7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream61% Other38% [I]
Device type: Desktop66% Mobile33% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream98% Other1% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: Yes [A] No [0 5 6 8 C G]
Mobile device: No [5 A C G] Yes [E]
Proxy: No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E] Yes [G]
VPN: No [0 6 7 A C E G]
Tor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C E]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: No [6 7 8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 20(Other)
Google search availability: NO
------------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
Network Quality#
Tri‑network performance is awful (classic HGC behavior). Direct connections are unusable and a relay is required—this is purely a landing node. The provider drops ICMP replies, so ping.pe has no data. There’s no concrete international‑interconnect metric here; BGP looks acceptable.
Network quality test script result image
BGPtools query result
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
0.80 ms AS9304 United States Oregon Portland hgc-intl.com
2.95 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] China Hong Kong he.net
221.24 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] United States California Los Angeles he.net
220.03 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] United States California Los Angeles he.net
157.91 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-US] United States California Los Angeles chinatelecom.com.cn
301.53 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
300.04 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn
301.71 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn
308.46 ms AS134774 [CHINANET-GD] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinatelecom.cn Telecom
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
0.46 ms AS9304 United States Oregon Portland hgc-intl.com
220.62 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] United States California Los Angeles he.net
219.76 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] United States California Los Angeles he.net
236.80 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-1] United States California Los Angeles he.net
388.95 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn
384.34 ms AS17623 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinaunicom.cn Unicom
364.01 ms AS17623 China Guangdong Shenzhen Bao'an District chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
4.30 ms AS9304 United States Oregon Portland hgc-intl.com
35.84 ms AS6939 [HURRICANE-11] Singapore he.net
34.76 ms AS6939 Singapore Equinix Singapore - Hurricane Electric - 1000Gbps he.net
260.48 ms AS58453 Singapore Equinix Singapore - China Mobile International - 100Gbps cmi.chinamobile.com
250.57 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Guangdong Guangzhou cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
255.04 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinamobileltd.com Mobile
251.69 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou I-C chinamobileltd.com Mobile
42.25 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
48.89 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
45.18 ms AS56040 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen gd.10086.cn Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 127.50Mbps 183.20Mbps 4.84ms
Hong Kong, China 182.48Mbps 138.36Mbps 7.14ms
Tokyo, Japan 25.21Mbps 45.06Mbps 60.37ms
TelecomSuzhou5G 27.91Mbps 17.50Mbps 286.67ms
TelecomZhejiang 0.09Mbps 10.92Mbps 365.86ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 7 min 0 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 23:38:18 HKT 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Performance is weak; disk IO and CPU are poor. Do not use as a performance box.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU cores : 1 @ 2000.000 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 926.1 MiB
Swap : 575.0 MiB
Disk : 11.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
VM Type : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : HGC Global Communications Limited
ASN : AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited
Host : HGC Global Communications Limited
Location : Kam Tin, Yuen Long District (NYL)
Country : Hong Kong
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.02 MB/s (3.0k) | 192.61 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.03 MB/s (3.0k) | 193.63 MB/s (3.0k)
Total | 24.06 MB/s (6.0k) | 386.25 MB/s (6.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 282.24 MB/s (551) | 278.74 MB/s (272)
Write | 297.24 MB/s (580) | 297.31 MB/s (290)
Total | 579.48 MB/s (1.1k) | 576.06 MB/s (562)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 686
Multi Core | 662
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23950053
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 891 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 18687.43 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 15009.70 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
Since it is in HK, local HK bandwidth is easily maxed; any HK line can do this.
Just enable BBR.
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
Picked a random Zouter to test.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
94 packets transmitted, 94 received, 0% packet loss, time 93124ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.880/4.000/38.719/4.418 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 24.4 MBytes 204 Mbits/sec 71 547 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec 39 577 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 22.1 MBytes 186 Mbits/sec 63 604 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 172 628 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec 0 655 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 680 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 53 704 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 94 727 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 749 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 772 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 223 MBytes 187 Mbits/sec 492 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 220 MBytes 184 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 47.4 MBytes 397 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 23.6 MBytes 198 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 23.7 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 24.0 MBytes 201 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 23.9 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 23.7 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 264 MBytes 222 Mbits/sec 16563 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 261 MBytes 219 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
South Korea#
KR is a datacenter + native IP product. The tri‑network direct connection is unusable, TikTok is not unlocked, and some ranges show geo‑routed‑to‑CN behavior. International connectivity is very poor—typical KR issues. Value is mediocre; avoid unless you specifically need KR.
Base configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
Korea Dual-ISP | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 100Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4(Dual ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
Price: $10.00 USD per month
Permanent 30% off code is yinnet2025, making it $7/mo; still a bit pricey.
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Native + pseudo‑residential IP. Netflix is not unlocked, and YouTube is geo‑routed to CN. IP quality looks average overall; most databases show moderate risk, but Cloudflare shows a 50% bot Traffic Mix—likely the whole IP range is degraded. Not recommended.
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly (DCH) Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit pseudo‑residential. Even if many databases label it as residential, it is effectively a datacenter‑hosted IP.
ipdata quality test image
My take differs from the AI summary here: the bot Traffic Mix is too high, so challenge risk is real. The AI rambled a bit—will fix later.
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
---------------Streaming unlocks -- tested with oneclickvirt/UnlockTests----------------
Can not detect IPv6 Address
Test time: 2025-12-04 18:10:16
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: KOR) [Native]
BingSearch YES (Region: KR)
Claude YES [Native]
Dazn YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Disney+ YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Gemini YES [Native]
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store NO (Region: CN) [Native]
IQiYi YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Instagram Licensed Audio YES [Native]
KOCOWA YES [Native]
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix Failed (Network Connection Failed)
Netflix CDN KR
OneTrust YES (Region: KR SEOUL) [Via DNS]
ChatGPT YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Paramount+ YES [Native]
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Reddit YES
SonyLiv Banned
Sora YES (Region: KR)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: KR)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: KR) [Native]
TikTok YES (Region: KR) [Native]
Viu.com YES [Native]
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region NO
YouTube CDN NO (Google Global CacheCDN - ISP Cooperation Main Service Unavailable) (Region: SEJONG - ICN)
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: Failed
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: KR)
Disney+: Yes (Region: KR)
Netflix: Failed (Network Connection)
YouTube Premium: No
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: KR)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: KR)
OneTrust Region: KR [Seoul]
iQyi Oversea Region: KR
Bing Region: KR (Risky)
Apple Region: KR
YouTube CDN: [SEJONG] in [Seoul, Korea]
Netflix Preferred CDN: [Sejong Networks] in [Seoul, Korea]
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: CHN)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: China
Google Search CAPTCHA Free:Yes
Steam Currency: KRW
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:Yes
=======================================
==============[ Korean ]===============
Wavve: Yes
Tving: Yes
WATCHA: Yes
Coupang Play: Yes
Naver TV: Yes
SPOTV NOW: Yes
Afreeca TV: Yes
KBS Domestic: Yes
=======================================
Copy
|
Google Play Store + Netflix + TikTok are not unlocked, and YouTube is geo‑routed to CN. This IP is basically unusable—worse than some ordinary line machines.
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
-------------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck--------------
Data is for reference only and not 100% accurate. If it differs from real-world results, manually verify across multiple databases.
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 29 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 13 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0 (Very Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0.0002 (Very Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)42% [I] Bot (lower is better)57% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 95 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: hosting [C] business [8 9] isp [0 3 7 A]
Company Type: isp [0 7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream92% Other7% [I]
Device type: Desktop92% Mobile7% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream98% Other1% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: No [0 5 6 8 A C G]
Mobile device: No [5 A C G] Yes [E]
Proxy: Yes [G] No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E]
VPN: No [0 6 7 A C E G]
TorExit: No [7]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: No [6 7 8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 11(Blacklisted) 23(Other)
Google search availability: NO
------------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
Network Quality#
Telecom/Unicom direct connections are terrible with heavy packet loss; Mobile is usable in many regions. Non‑Mobile users should relay. International connectivity is awful (even GitHub is slow). Typical KR issue. The “CN2 GIA” routing is laughable—detours via the US.
Network quality test script result image
ping.pe test image
ping.pe test image
International connectivity is very poor—this is not the vendor’s fault but a broader KR issue. CDN paths often detour via JP/US. This product is a textbook example of weak interconnects.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
----------------------Return path routing -- based on nexttrace-----------------------
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
1.47 ms AS138195 South Korea moack.co.kr
0.82 ms * RFC1918
57.70 ms AS4809 [CTHKI-HK] South Korea Seoul Seoul www.chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
41.45 ms * [CHINANET-GD] South Korea Seoul Seoul Telecom
39.85 ms * [CN2-BackBone] China Beijing chinatelecom.cn Telecom
187.32 ms * [CN2-BackBone] China Guangdong Guangzhou CN2→163 chinatelecom.cn Telecom
191.20 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
204.64 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-GD] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
1.65 ms AS138195 South Korea moack.co.kr
213.56 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn
189.62 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn Unicom
222.03 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn
245.57 ms AS17623 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinaunicom.cn Unicom
225.13 ms AS17623 China Guangdong Shenzhen Bao'an District chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
5.45 ms AS138195 South Korea moack.co.kr
0.51 ms * RFC1918
3.30 ms AS3491 Germany Hesse Frankfurt am Main pccwglobal.com
83.73 ms AS3491 [PCCW-BACKBONE] China Hong Kong pccwglobal.com
87.00 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] Singapore cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
90.98 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Hong Kong cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
101.71 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Guangdong Guangzhou cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
99.46 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinamobileltd.com Mobile
107.33 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou I-C chinamobileltd.com Mobile
99.73 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
103.10 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
106.71 ms AS56040 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen gd.10086.cn Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 290.66Mbps 94.92Mbps 1.16ms
Tokyo, Japan 29.20Mbps 0.06Mbps 276.38ms
Singapore 20.37Mbps 12.46Mbps 87.58ms
UnicomShanghai5G 13.11Mbps 12.53Mbps 207.39ms
TelecomZhejiang 0.99Mbps 10.13Mbps 219.98ms
TelecomZhenjiang5G 0.41Mbps 5.26Mbps 197.93ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 7 min 32 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 18:14:50 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Performance is mediocre; IO and CPU are average.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 5 hours, 7 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2686 v4 @ 2.30GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 961.0 MiB
Swap : 539.0 MiB
Disk : 10.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-10-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Sejong Networks
ASN : AS9848 SEJONG NETWORKS
Host : Sejong
Location : Seoul, Seoul (11)
Country : South Korea
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.27 MB/s (3.0k) | 197.45 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.28 MB/s (3.0k) | 198.49 MB/s (3.1k)
Total | 24.56 MB/s (6.1k) | 395.94 MB/s (6.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 340.76 MB/s (665) | 318.66 MB/s (311)
Write | 358.86 MB/s (700) | 339.88 MB/s (331)
Total | 699.63 MB/s (1.3k) | 658.54 MB/s (642)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 533
Multi Core | 508
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23949429
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 556 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 14824.14 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 11494.64 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
Don’t expect much for international connectivity—KR machines are generally weak, and even the best KT interconnect isn’t great.
First enable BBR
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
I recommend:
1
2
|
User -> VMISS.KR.SEL.TRI.Basic -> yinnet
Copy
|
There are few Korea line machines to choose from; the only reasonably cost-effective direct Korea option is VMISS.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
VMISS test
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4072ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.445/0.581/0.775/0.112 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 8.40 MBytes 70.5 Mbits/sec 711 56.6 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 7.46 MBytes 62.6 Mbits/sec 862 50.9 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 7.46 MBytes 62.6 Mbits/sec 1122 18.4 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.49 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec 192 79.2 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 5.59 MBytes 46.9 Mbits/sec 924 28.3 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 8.26 MBytes 69.3 Mbits/sec 755 65.0 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.69 MBytes 81.3 Mbits/sec 600 59.4 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 8.95 MBytes 75.1 Mbits/sec 375 67.9 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 7.08 MBytes 59.4 Mbits/sec 1100 41.0 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.10 MBytes 34.4 Mbits/sec 471 113 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 57.5 Mbits/sec 7112 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 67.7 MBytes 56.8 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.74 MBytes 39.8 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 5.64 MBytes 47.3 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 5.47 MBytes 45.9 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 5.63 MBytes 47.2 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 5.50 MBytes 46.2 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.37 MBytes 45.1 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 5.69 MBytes 47.7 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.94 MBytes 41.5 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 5.68 MBytes 47.7 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 5.15 MBytes 43.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 55.2 MBytes 46.3 Mbits/sec 28 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 53.8 MBytes 45.1 Mbits/sec receiver
Speed is capped at 50Mbps—this is a VMISS limitation. In KR, 50Mbps is normal; bandwidth is generally low, and 200Mbps is considered high. So 50Mbps is acceptable.
Copy
|
If you want higher bandwidth, consider pulling from HK, for example:
1
2
3
|
YXVM.vol -> yinnet
zouter->yinnet
Copy
|
Latency is about 40ms, with ~100Mbps upload and ~250Mbps download, though retransmits are a bit high.
Japan#
A relatively rare Japan pseudo‑residential native IP product. Some IPs are geo‑routed to CN; streaming unlocks are average, and some Japan‑only platforms like DMM are blocked. Overall IP quality is middling but fair for the price. Tri‑network direct is unusable, so a relay is required. HK↔JP interconnect is decent with little retransmit, but it adds ~50ms; direct Shanghai↔Japan is better but expensive. Hardware performance is weak overall.
Basic configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
Japan Dual-ISP | VPS
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 200Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4(Dual ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
Price: $10.00 USD per month
With 20% off promo code `4TMOGGY5W9`, it’s $8/mo—very strong value for a JP residential dedicated IP.
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Most streaming services unlock; this is a standard pseudo‑residential profile. It is unusually flagged by ip2location, while other databases look normal. Common streaming unlocks work, Gemini is available, but MetaAI is geo‑routed to CN and unusable. TikTok works and shows JP region (verified). Japan‑only platforms like DMM and Kancolle do not unlock, which is a downside for a JP residential IP—but if you don’t need them, it’s fine.
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly (DCH) Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit pseudo‑residential, and the entire IP range is flagged as VPN.
ipdata quality test image
The red warning is Data Center, which isn’t a big deal here.
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
Test time: 2025-12-04 22:17:34
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: JPN)
BingSearch YES (Region: JP)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: JP)
Disney+ YES (Region: JP)
Gemini YES (Region: SG)
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: SG)
IQiYi YES (Region: JP)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA NO
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix YES (Region: JP)
Netflix CDN JP
OneTrust YES (Region: JP TOKYO)
ChatGPT YES (Region: JP)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: JP)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv Banned
Sora YES (Region: JP)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: JP)
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: JP)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: JP)
TikTok YES (Region: JP)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: SG)
YouTube CDN NRT
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: [JP]
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: JP)
Disney+: Yes (Region: JP)
Netflix: Yes (Region: JP)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: SG)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: JP)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: JP)
OneTrust Region: JP [Tokyo]
iQyi Oversea Region: JP
Bing Region: JP (Risky)
Apple Region: JP
YouTube CDN: Tokyo
Netflix Preferred CDN: Tokyo
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: SGP)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Singapore
Google Search CAPTCHA Free:Yes
Steam Currency: JPY
---Forum--
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:Yes
=======================================
===============[ Japan ]===============
DMM: Yes
DMM TV: No
Abema.TV: No
Niconico: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR)
Telasa: No
U-NEXT: Yes
Hulu Japan: No
TVer: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR)
Lemino: Yes
AnimeFesta: Yes
WOWOW: No
VideoMarket: Yes
D Anime Store: Yes
FOD(Fuji TV): Yes
Radiko: Yes (City: TOKYO)
Karaoke@DAM: Yes
J:com On Demand: Yes
WATCHA: Yes
Rakuten TV JP: No
---Game---
Kancolle Japan: Failed (Network Connection)
Pretty Derby Japan: Yes
Konosuba Fantastic Days:Failed (Network Connection)
Princess Connect Re:Dive Japan:Yes
Project Sekai: Colorful Stage: Yes
---Music---
Mora: Yes
music.jp: Yes
---Forum---
EroGameSpace: Yes
Copy
|
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
-------------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck--------------
Data is for reference only and not 100% accurate. If it differs from real-world results, manually verify across multiple databases.
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 0 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3 H]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.0002 (Very Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 (Very Low) [A]
Threat Level: Low [H] low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)87% [I] Bot (lower is better)12% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 95 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: isp [0 3 7] unknown [C] hosting [8 9 A] business [H]
Company Type: isp [0] business [7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream90% Other9% [I]
Device type: Desktop89% Mobile10% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream99% Other0% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: No [0 5 6 C G H] Yes [8 A]
Mobile device: Yes [E] No [5 A C G]
Proxy: No [0 4 6 7 8 9 A C E H] Yes [5 G]
VPN: Yes [6 7] No [0 A C E G H]
TorExit: No [7]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: Yes [6 7] No [8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E H]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 16(Other)
Google search availability: NO
------------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
Network Quality#
Tri‑network IIJ, but it’s not direct. Direct connections are terrible with heavy loss, so a relay is required—either JP direct or HK relay.
Network quality test script result image
ping.pe test image
ping.pe test image
Packet loss toward CN is quite severe. International connectivity is decent, and US/HK interconnect is excellent—especially to HK.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
----------------------Return path routing -- based on nexttrace-----------------------
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
2.79 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
0.92 ms * [JPNIC-NET] Japan Tokyo
2.49 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
1.04 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
1.04 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
112.47 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-FJ] Japan Tokyo chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
151.72 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Hong Kong chinatelecom.com.cn
167.18 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
171.94 ms AS134774 [CHINANET-GD] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinatelecom.cn Telecom
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
0.35 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
0.87 ms * [JPNIC-NET] Japan Tokyo
1.75 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
174.92 ms AS2497 [JPNIC-NET] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
193.99 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Shanghai chinaunicom.cn Unicom
202.83 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Shanghai chinaunicom.cn Unicom
197.37 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinaunicom.cn Unicom
213.42 ms AS17623 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinaunicom.cn Unicom
209.71 ms AS17623 China Guangdong Shenzhen Bao'an District chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
0.29 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
0.89 ms * [JPNIC-NET] Japan Tokyo
1.51 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
1.09 ms AS2497 [IIJ] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
78.32 ms AS2497 [IIJ] China Hong Kong iij.ad.jp
78.23 ms AS2497 [JPNIC-NET] Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
76.77 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Hong Kong cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
241.56 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
242.70 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinamobileltd.com Mobile
244.23 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou I-C chinamobileltd.com Mobile
240.93 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
248.27 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
249.02 ms AS56040 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen gd.10086.cn Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 367.55Mbps 181.93Mbps 930.84ms
Tokyo, Japan 617.57Mbps 186.84Mbps 2.53ms
Hong Kong, China 111.98Mbps 111.98Mbps 54.12ms
TelecomZhenjiang5G 0.10Mbps 11.09Mbps 231.45ms
TelecomZhejiang 0.14Mbps 0.15Mbps 171.68ms
MobileSuzhou 0.00Mbps 0.00Mbps 777.86ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 6 min 57 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 22:22:04 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Performance is weak: IO is low and CPU is weak. If you need performance, be cautious.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 9 hours, 18 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 1995.312 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 961.0 MiB
Swap : 539.0 MiB
Disk : 10.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-10-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : TRUSTCHECKINC
ASN : AS202736 WISDOM CLOUD INTERNET TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD.
Location : Toshima City, Tokyo (13)
Country : Japan
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.29 MB/s (3.0k) | 197.97 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.29 MB/s (3.0k) | 199.02 MB/s (3.1k)
Total | 24.59 MB/s (6.1k) | 396.99 MB/s (6.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 340.25 MB/s (664) | 306.16 MB/s (298)
Write | 358.33 MB/s (699) | 326.55 MB/s (318)
Total | 698.58 MB/s (1.3k) | 632.72 MB/s (616)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 657
Multi Core | 654
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23949886
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 862 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 17654.50 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 14131.56 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
It sits several hops downstream of Hurricane; despite multiple hops, interconnect quality is good.
BGPtools query result
Enable BBR: without it, downstream is limited to ~250Mbps with mild retransmits (~700). With BBR, it reaches 400–600Mbps with near‑zero retransmits.
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
I recommend HK→JP. (Shanghai→Japan is better but more expensive and the upstream is average.)
1
2
|
User -> line node -> zouter -> yinnet
Copy
|
Most HK line nodes work (DMIT/zouter/bage/YXVM). I used zouter because it’s cheap and good value; others are fine too.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
zouter HK -> JP test
34 packets transmitted, 34 received, 0% packet loss, time 33052ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 51.438/51.657/52.560/0.308 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 19.0 MBytes 159 Mbits/sec 1 1.46 MBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.47 MBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.48 MBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec 0 1.49 MBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.51 MBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.55 MBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.61 MBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.70 MBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec 0 1.80 MBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 1.94 MBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 224 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec 1 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 222 MBytes 185 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 33.2 MBytes 278 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 54.7 MBytes 459 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 53.7 MBytes 450 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 53.9 MBytes 452 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 54.0 MBytes 453 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 54.3 MBytes 456 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 53.8 MBytes 451 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 54.1 MBytes 454 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 54.0 MBytes 453 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 53.9 MBytes 452 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 523 MBytes 436 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 519 MBytes 436 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
United States#
US is the classic Cogent/NTT/GTT pseudo‑residential series. Native IP, smaller port, but there is a standing 30% off code, and the post‑discount price is quite reasonable. It’s a good lower‑tier alternative to true residential for exit use (true residential is commonly around USD 30/month).
Base configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
|
US Dual ISP | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 100Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 (ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Routing: Standard direct
Available OS: Linux
Starts from
USD 6.00 per month
Discount code: X92Q13RYUD, after discount USD 4.20/mo
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Streaming unlocks are mostly complete. IP quality is average (some IPs show geo‑routed to CN). This matches pseudo‑residential expectations: a relatively clean native datacenter IP. These are commonly used by beginners in TikTok/e‑commerce because they are cheap and native IP, meeting basic needs. If your budget is limited or you want to try it out, this is worth considering. Among pseudo‑residential vendors, this IP is quite cost‑effective.
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly (DCH) Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit pseudo‑residential products. Although most databases label it as residential, it is in fact datacenter‑hosted.
ipdata quality test image
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
|
---------------Streaming unlocks -- tested with oneclickvirt/UnlockTests----------------
Can not detect IPv6 Address
Test time: 2025-12-04 16:06:06
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: USA)
BingSearch YES (Region: US)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: US)
Disney+ YES (Region: US)
Gemini YES (Region: US)
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: US)
IQiYi YES (Region: US)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA YES
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix YES (Region: US)
Netflix CDN US
OneTrust YES (Region: US CALIFORNIA)
ChatGPT YES (Region: US)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: US)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv YES (Region: US)
Sora YES (Region: US)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: US)
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: US)
TikTok YES (Region: US)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES
YouTube CDN LAX
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: [US]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 25 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 16:06:10 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: US)
OneTrust Region: US [California]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US (Risky)
Apple Region: US
YouTube CDN: Los Angeles, CA
Netflix Preferred CDN: Los Angeles, CA
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: Yes
=======================================
===========[ North America ]===========
Paramount+: Failed (Error: 406)
Discovery+: Yes (Region: US)
Acorn TV: Yes
BritBox: Yes
SonyLiv: Yes (Region: US)
NBA TV: Yes
TLC GO: Yes (Region: US)
Shudder: Yes
Fubo TV: Yes (Region:US)
Tubi TV: Yes
Pluto TV: Yes
KOCOWA: Yes
AMC+: Yes (Region: USA)
MathsSpot Roblox: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR 1)
---US---
FOX: Yes
Hulu: Yes
NFL+: Yes
ESPN+:[Sponsored by Jam] Yes
MGM+: Yes
Starz: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR)
Philo: Yes
FXNOW: Yes
HBO Max: Yes (Region: US)
Crackle: Failed (Network Connection)
CW TV: Yes
A&E TV: Yes
NBC TV: Yes
Sling TV: Yes
encoreTVB: Yes
Peacock TV: Yes
Popcornflix: Failed (Network Connection)
Crunchyroll: Yes
Directv Stream: Yes
Meta AI: No
---CA---
HotStar: No (Discontinued in the US)
CBC Gem: No
Crave: No
=======================================
Copy
|
You can see streaming is mostly unlocked, but MetaAI and Gemini are not, because the region is geo‑blocked to CN. This is basically “dead on arrival,” so consider carefully if you need those.
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
----------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck----------
IPV4 ASN : AS2914 NTT-DATA-2914
IPV4 Location : Los Angeles / California / United States
IPV4 Active IPs : 203/256 (subnet /24) 572416/16777216 (prefix /8)
--------------------------------------------------
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 33 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 3 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 99 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 93 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.0002 (Very Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0.0009 (Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)55% [I] Bot (lower is better)44% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 95 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: isp [0 3 7 A] business [8 9] unknown [C]
Company Type: isp [0 7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream49% Other50% [I]
Device type: Desktop44% Mobile55% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream93% Other6% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: No [0 5 6 8 A C G]
Mobile device: No [5 A C G] Yes [E]
Proxy: No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C] Yes [E G]
VPN: No [0 6 7 A C G] Yes [E]
Tor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C E]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: No [6 7 8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 7(Blacklisted) 19(Other)
Google search availability: NO
----------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker----------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
163 ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
AOL ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 22 sec
Time : 2025-12-04 16:12:02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Network Quality#
West‑US 4837 direct routes for the three major networks. Off‑peak has almost no loss, but peak hours are only moderately stable, with frequent stalling/disconnects. If you mainly upload videos and don’t need stability, direct is fine to save money. For live streaming or stability/speed‑sensitive use, relay is recommended.
Network quality test script result image
ping.pe test image
ping.pe test image
The advantage of datacenter IPs is relatively stable international connectivity and low latency, though you can see some packet loss toward China.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
----------------------Return path routing -- based on nexttrace-----------------------
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
16.15 ms AS174 United States Oklahoma Lawton cogentco.com
0.24 ms * RFC1918
0.54 ms * RFC1918
9.13 ms * China Hong Kong
168.01 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinaunicom.cn Unicom
163.98 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinaunicom.cn Unicom
164.03 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinaunicom.cn Unicom
175.58 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
178.82 ms AS4134 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
21.63 ms AS174 United States Oklahoma Lawton cogentco.com
0.28 ms * RFC1918
0.70 ms * RFC1918
9.79 ms * China Hong Kong
169.18 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinaunicom.cn Unicom
164.68 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinaunicom.cn Unicom
164.48 ms AS17816 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Province Shenzhen ChinaUnicom Unicom
170.36 ms AS17623 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinaunicom.cn Unicom
161.71 ms AS17623 China Guangdong Shenzhen Bao'an District chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
15.55 ms AS174 United States Oklahoma Lawton cogentco.com
0.28 ms * RFC1918
0.60 ms * RFC1918
186.15 ms * China Hong Kong
178.27 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn Unicom
210.71 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com
213.21 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
207.65 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
211.99 ms AS56040 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen gd.10086.cn Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 39.86Mbps 39.65Mbps 38.67ms
Los Angeles 1571.74Mbps 94.72Mbps 1.15ms
Tokyo, Japan 68.10Mbps 18.40Mbps 99.39ms
UnicomShanghai5G 43.22Mbps 14.42Mbps 179.95ms
TelecomZhejiang 47.39Mbps 38.83Mbps 159.94ms
TelecomZhejiang 46.85Mbps 28.37Mbps 173.51ms
MobileSuzhou 10.31Mbps 0.11Mbps 268.27ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 7 min 5 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 16:19:54 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Performance is average, but IO is a bit low. If you need strong disk read/write, take note. CPU is decent.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 3 hours, 19 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7K62 48-Core Processor
CPU cores : 1 @ 2595.124 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 961.0 MiB
Swap : 539.0 MiB
Disk : 10.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-10-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : NTT America, Inc.
ASN : AS2914 NTT America, Inc.
Host : NTT America, Inc
Location : Redmond, Washington (WA)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.39 MB/s (3.0k) | 195.02 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.39 MB/s (3.0k) | 196.05 MB/s (3.0k)
Total | 24.79 MB/s (6.1k) | 391.07 MB/s (6.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 340.53 MB/s (665) | 300.72 MB/s (293)
Write | 358.63 MB/s (700) | 320.74 MB/s (313)
Total | 699.16 MB/s (1.3k) | 621.47 MB/s (606)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1009
Multi Core | 983
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23949257
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 1616 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 42863.91 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 19673.36 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
NTT is tier‑1. Connectivity is essentially unbeatable, so you don’t need to worry about interconnect quality.
BGPtools query result
Remember to enable BBR. It can still max out without it, but BBR reduces retransmits to near zero.
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
I recommend:
1
2
|
User -> BWH/DMIT (LA datacenter) -> yinnet
Copy
|
Any Los Angeles datacenter line can max it out because it’s essentially intra‑datacenter transfer with sub‑1ms latency (which also shows why NTT/Cogent are pseudo‑residential—true residential can’t be 1ms from a datacenter).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
BWH test
95 packets transmitted, 95 received, 0% packet loss, time 95809ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.735/0.835/1.083/0.070 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 13.2 MBytes 111 Mbits/sec 0 93.3 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.8 MBytes 90.7 Mbits/sec 0 82.0 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.0 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec 0 87.7 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.9 Mbits/sec 8 96.2 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 0 73.5 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 0 70.7 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 11.7 MBytes 98.5 Mbits/sec 0 76.4 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 0 66.5 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 11.3 MBytes 94.9 Mbits/sec 0 79.2 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 11.5 MBytes 96.4 Mbits/sec 0 90.5 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 116 MBytes 97.0 Mbits/sec 8 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 114 MBytes 95.5 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 351 MBytes 2.94 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 357 MBytes 3.00 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 384 MBytes 3.22 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 361 MBytes 3.03 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 340 MBytes 2.85 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 334 MBytes 2.80 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 354 MBytes 2.97 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 332 MBytes 2.79 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 374 MBytes 3.13 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 369 MBytes 3.10 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.48 GBytes 2.99 Gbits/sec 25433 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.47 GBytes 2.98 Gbits/sec receiver
Upload is capped at 100Mbps, but download is almost uncapped—likely a local 3G port, fully saturated. Packet loss is rather high; after rate‑limiting it improves noticeably. Since this is intra‑datacenter transfer, retransmits aren’t a big issue.
Copy
|
Of course, you might not have DMIT. If you don’t use BWH, I recommend:
1
2
|
VMISS.US-LosAngeles-TRI or Taphip.US China Optimized -> yinnet
Copy
|
These two share the same upstream and are always available. The three‑network routing is top‑tier optimized. Ports are 200Mbps/1000Mbps, which matches yinnet’s port perfectly without waste. Tests are basically identical to BWH, so I won’t paste repeats.
Vietnam#
Currently the best value Vietnam residential offering: true residential “home cloud.” This product and price are rare, a favorite for TikTok users with almost no competition. It’s arguably the top Vietnam residential option, but the three major China networks are terrible, so it really only works well via HK relay.
Basic configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
VietnamDual ISP| VPS
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 100Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4(Dual ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
USD 12.00 per month
With 30% off promo code 5YIK1Y5YNI, Vietnam residential is USD 8.40/mo, which is great value.
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Excellent true residential, likely “home cloud.” At this price it’s basically unmatched. Upstream is VNPT, and streaming that should unlock does unlock. You won’t find a better Vietnam residential option.
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly an ISP/MOB true residential product. Very solid—Vietnam true residential, likely “home cloud.”
ipdata quality test image
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
---------------Streaming unlocks -- tested with oneclickvirt/UnlockTests----------------
Can not detect IPv6 Address
Test time: 2025-12-04 22:25:22
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: VNM)
BingSearch YES (Region: WW)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: VN)
Disney+ NO (UnSupported)
Gemini YES (Region: VN)
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: VN)
IQiYi YES (Region: VN)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA NO
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix YES (Region: VN)
Netflix CDN HK
OneTrust YES (Region: VN HANOI)
ChatGPT YES (but cdn-cgi not unsupported) (Region: VN)
Paramount+ Unknown: get www.paramountplus.com failed with code: 406
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: VN)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv Banned
Sora NO (Region: VN)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: VN)
Steam Store YES (Community Unavailable) (Region: VN)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: VN)
TikTok YES (Region: VN)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: VN)
YouTube CDN vdc - HAN
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: [VN]
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: VN)
Disney+: No
Netflix: Yes (Region: VN)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: VN)
Amazon Prime Video: No (Service Not Available)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: VN)
OneTrust Region: VN [Hanoi]
iQyi Oversea Region: VN
Bing Region: WW (Risky)
Apple Region: VN
YouTube CDN: [VDC] in [Hanoi]
Netflix Preferred CDN: Hong Kong
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: VNM)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Vietnam
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: VND
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: Yes
Copy
|
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
-------------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck--------------
Data is for reference only and not 100% accurate. If it differs from real-world results, manually verify across multiple databases.
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 32 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 96 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 9 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.0095 (Elevated) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0.0017 (Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)22% [I] Bot (lower is better)77% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 95 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: isp [0 3 7 A] hosting [C] government [8] business [9]
Company Type: isp [0 7 A]
Browser type: Mainstream73% Other26% [I]
Device type: Desktop75% Mobile24% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream93% Other6% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: Yes [C] No [0 5 6 8 A G]
Mobile device: Yes [E] No [5 A C G]
Proxy: No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E] Yes [G]
VPN: No [0 6 7 A C E G]
Tor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C E]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: No [6 7 8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 9(Blacklisted) 13(Other)
Google search availability: NO
------------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
Network Quality#
My IP happened to be blocked, so I tested neighbors. Most regions are around 200–300ms; a few are direct, but all three major networks show 10–20% loss. Direct use is tough—HK relay is recommended and works very well.
ping.pe test image
ping.pe test image
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
----------------------Return path routing -- based on nexttrace-----------------------
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
17.28 ms AS135905 Vietnam Hanoi Hanoi Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group
13.05 ms AS135905 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Hanoi VIETNAM POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP
0.63 ms AS45899 Vietnam Hanoi Hanoi vnpt.vn
1.16 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Da Nang vnpt.vn
1.01 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Hanoi vnpt.vn
90.94 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
87.57 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
14.08 ms AS135905 Vietnam Hanoi Hanoi Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group
0.69 ms AS135905 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Hanoi VIETNAM POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP
0.91 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Hanoi Hanoi vnpt.vn
41.55 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Da Nang vnpt.vn
11.22 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Da Nang C-I vnpt.vn
34.59 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Singapore vnpt.vn
41.35 ms AS6453 [TATA-COMMUNICATIONS] Singapore tatacommunications.com
192.04 ms AS6453 [TATA-COMMUNICATIONS] Singapore tatacommunications.com
204.97 ms AS6453 United States California Los Angeles tatacommunications.com
246.06 ms AS6453 United States California Los Angeles tatacommunications.com
219.18 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
8.05 ms AS135905 Vietnam Hanoi Hanoi Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group
7.76 ms AS135905 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Hanoi VIETNAM POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP
0.83 ms AS45899 Vietnam Quang Ninh Cam Pha vnpt.vn
33.42 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Da Nang vnpt.vn
41.28 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Ho Chi Minh City vnpt.vn
23.69 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam Ho Chi Minh District Ho Chi Minh City vnpt.vn
42.67 ms AS45899 [VNPT-VN] Vietnam vnpt.vn
49.96 ms AS6453 [TATA-COMMUNICATIONS] Singapore tatacommunications.com
62.74 ms AS6453 [TATA-COMMUNICATIONS] Singapore tatacommunications.com
65.18 ms AS6453 [TATA-COMMUNICATIONS] China Hong Kong tatacommunications.com
221.99 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Hong Kong cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
214.70 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Guangdong Guangzhou cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
205.06 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinamobileltd.com Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 89.81Mbps 40.62Mbps 1.12ms
Hong Kong, China 71.42Mbps 53.66Mbps 80.88ms
Singapore 61.80Mbps 2.99Mbps 46.02ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 9 min 13 sec
Time : Thu Dec 4 22:31:02 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
Performance is average overall.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 3 hours, 50 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 2199.996 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 961.0 MiB
Swap : 539.0 MiB
Disk : 10.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-10-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group
ASN : AS135905 VIETNAM POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP
Host : VNPT
Location : Hanoi, Hanoi (HN)
Country : Vietnam
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.28 MB/s (3.0k) | 197.75 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 12.29 MB/s (3.0k) | 198.79 MB/s (3.1k)
Total | 24.58 MB/s (6.1k) | 396.54 MB/s (6.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 340.53 MB/s (665) | 305.10 MB/s (297)
Write | 358.63 MB/s (700) | 325.42 MB/s (317)
Total | 699.16 MB/s (1.3k) | 630.53 MB/s (614)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 657
Multi Core | 650
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23949908
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 863 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 17772.11 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 13274.28 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
Upstream is directly VNPT, which is top‑tier in Vietnam. This is “home cloud,” and the HK transfer is quite good.
BGPtools query result
BBR on/off makes little difference; the port is only 100Mbps anyway.
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
It’s a bit weird: zouter can’t reach this IP, but most other tests can. Latency is around 20ms—pretty good.
I recommend:
1
2
3
4
|
User -> YXVM -> yinnet
or
User -> line node -> yinnet
Copy
|
Any HK line node can pull a full 100Mbps, so the choice doesn’t matter much.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
BWH test
57 packets transmitted, 57 received, 0% packet loss, time 56089ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.386/23.582/24.320/0.188 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 8.89 MBytes 74.5 Mbits/sec 1962 874 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec 304 868 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.3 Mbits/sec 334 857 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec 428 908 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec 366 851 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.33 MBytes 78.2 Mbits/sec 932 707 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 8.85 MBytes 74.3 Mbits/sec 99 352 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.01 MBytes 75.6 Mbits/sec 130 518 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 10.1 MBytes 85.1 Mbits/sec 493 564 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec 352 451 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 101 MBytes 85.0 Mbits/sec 5400 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 101 MBytes 84.2 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.7 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.5 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.7 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.6 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.6 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.6 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.6 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 11.3 MBytes 95.0 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.6 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 95.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 115 MBytes 96.4 Mbits/sec 316 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
Taiwan#
Rare TW interconnect machine with native datacenter IP. HK‑TW connectivity is excellent and it can connect directly to HiNet. Few competitors and good value. China Telecom/Unicom are terrible; Mobile is “happy machine.” Streaming unlocks are complete, and direct exit is also a good choice.
Default configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
Taiwan | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 200Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4 + IPv6 (native)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
Starts from USD 10.00 per month
Standing 20% off promo code 6HIC5CQM8H, after discount USD 8.00/mo
Copy
|
IP Quality#
Native datacenter IP with complete streaming unlocks—very nice. For TW datacenter IPs, this quality is excellent.
IP quality test script result image
IPv6 Quality
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
Clearly a (DCH) Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit native IP product
ipdata quality test image
Streaming unlocks test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
Test time: 2025-12-04 23:56:16
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: TWN)
BingSearch YES (Region: TW)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: TW)
Disney+ YES (Region: TW)
Gemini YES (Region: TW)
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: TW)
IQiYi YES (Region: TW)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA NO
MetaAI NO (GeoBlocked)
Netflix YES (Region: TW)
Netflix CDN TW
OneTrust YES (Region: TW TAIWAN)
ChatGPT YES (Region: TW)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: TW)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv Banned
Sora YES (Region: TW)
Spotify Registration YES (Region: TW)
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: TW)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: TW)
TikTok YES (Region: TW)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: TW)
YouTube CDN TSA
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: [TW]
Copy
|
Granular Unlock Testing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: TW)
Disney+: Yes (Region: TW)
Netflix: Yes (Region: TW)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: TW)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: TW)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: TW)
OneTrust Region: TW [Taiwan]
iQyi Oversea Region: TW
Bing Region: TW (Risky)
Apple Region: TW
YouTube CDN: Taipei
Netflix Preferred CDN: [AboveNet Communications Taiwan] in [Taipei]
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: TWN)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Taiwan
Google Search CAPTCHA Free:Yes
Steam Currency: TWD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:Yes
=======================================
==============[ Taiwan ]===============
KKTV: Yes
LiTV: Yes
MyVideo: Yes
4GTV.TV: Yes
LineTV.TW: Yes
Hami Video: Yes
CatchPlay+: Yes
HBO Max: Yes (Region: TW)
Bahamut Anime: Yes (Region: TW)
SonyLiv: No
Bilibili Taiwan Only: Yes
=======================================
Copy
|
Below are test results from common IP databases.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
-------------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck--------------
Data is for reference only and not 100% accurate. If it differs from real-world results, manually verify across multiple databases.
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 10 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 72 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 99 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.002 (Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0.0059 (Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)48% [I] Bot (lower is better)51% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 61 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 34 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: Commercial [3] hosting [A] isp [7] business [0 9] unknown [8 C]
Company Type: isp [7] business [0 A]
Browser type: Mainstream82% Other17% [I]
Device type: Desktop75% Mobile24% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream90% Other9% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: No [0 5 6 8 A C G]
Mobile device: No [5 A C G] Yes [E]
Proxy: No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E] Yes [G]
VPN: No [0 6 7 A C E G]
Tor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C E]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: No [6 7] Yes [8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 17(Other)
Google search availability: NO
------------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker------------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
Network Quality#
V4 Telecom/Unicom are terrible; Mobile is a “happy machine.” For V6, some Unicom direct routes work, while Telecom/Mobile are still bad. This machine isn’t meant for direct China use anyway, so it’s not a big deal.
Network quality test script result image
IPv6 Network Quality
Network quality test script result image
ping.pe test image
ping.pe test image
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
----------------------Return path routing -- based on nexttrace-----------------------
Sequentially tests Telecom/Unicom/Mobile routes; core program comes from nexttrace.
Guangzhou Telecom 58.60.188.222
0.94 ms AS134823 China Taiwan Taipei telecom.tw
1.31 ms * RFC1918
228.96 ms AS3491 Germany Hesse Frankfurt am Main pccwglobal.com
257.66 ms AS4134 Germany Hesse Frankfurt am Main chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
231.27 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Beijing chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
234.16 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn Telecom
239.57 ms AS4134 [CHINANET-BB] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinatelecom.com.cn
Guangzhou Unicom 210.21.196.6
0.41 ms AS134823 China Taiwan Taipei telecom.tw
5.37 ms * RFC1918
0.86 ms AS2914 [NTT-BACKBONE] China Taiwan Taipei gin.ntt.net
104.46 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn
103.08 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn Unicom
98.90 ms AS4837 [CU169-BACKBONE] China Beijing chinaunicom.cn Unicom
141.28 ms AS17623 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen chinaunicom.cn Unicom
133.07 ms AS17623 China Guangdong Shenzhen Bao'an District chinaunicom.cn Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile 120.196.165.24
1.29 ms AS134823 China Taiwan Taipei telecom.tw
1.10 ms * RFC1918
4.49 ms AS2914 [NTT-BACKBONE] China Taiwan Taipei gin.ntt.net
28.80 ms AS2914 [NTT-GLOBAL] China Hong Kong gin.ntt.net
30.49 ms AS58453 [CMI-INT] China Guangdong Guangzhou cmi.chinamobile.com Mobile
30.76 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou X-I chinamobileltd.com Mobile
32.70 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou I-C chinamobileltd.com Mobile
36.08 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
36.58 ms AS9808 [CMNET] China Guangdong Guangzhou chinamobileltd.com Mobile
38.60 ms AS56040 [APNIC-AP] China Guangdong Shenzhen gd.10086.cn Mobile
---------------------Auto-updated speed test node list -- original script----------------------
Location Upload Download Latency
Speedtest.net 488.13Mbps 153.88Mbps 3.20ms
Hong Kong, China 200.77Mbps 126.65Mbps 23.23ms
Tokyo, Japan 117.12Mbps 92.44Mbps 48.64ms
TelecomSuzhou5G 30.11Mbps 46.42Mbps 244.40ms
TelecomZhejiang 0.26Mbps 42.93Mbps 252.00ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 7 min 11 sec
Time : Fri Dec 5 00:00:00 CST 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy
|
CPU is average, but the IO is absurdly low.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 10 hours, 58 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
CPU cores : 1 @ 2899.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 961.0 MiB
Swap : 540.0 MiB
Disk : 10.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-10-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : IMCLOUD
ASN : AS134823 Sky Digital Co., Ltd.
Host : Imcloud Technology Co., Ltd.
Location : Taipei, Taipei City (TPE)
Country : Taiwan
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 6.48 MB/s (1.6k) | 196.74 MB/s (3.0k)
Write | 6.48 MB/s (1.6k) | 197.78 MB/s (3.0k)
Total | 12.97 MB/s (3.2k) | 394.53 MB/s (6.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 340.42 MB/s (664) | 301.97 MB/s (294)
Write | 358.51 MB/s (700) | 322.08 MB/s (314)
Total | 698.93 MB/s (1.3k) | 624.05 MB/s (608)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 890
Multi Core | 887
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23950080
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 1596 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 41398.48 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 18575.94 MB/s
Copy
|
Relay Strategies#
This machine beats HiNet/SeedNet mainly on international connectivity. It can connect directly to HiNet, and HK‑TW connectivity is excellent, forming:
1
2
|
HK->yinnet->hinet/seednet
Copy
|
This network has low latency and low loss—great for streaming. Price is reasonable; Misaka/AKR are expensive, so this is a good budget compromise.
BGPtools query result
This one is different: BBR is optional. With BBR you get higher speed but more retransmits; without BBR you get ~150Mbps baseline with near‑zero loss.
1
2
3
|
wget http://sh.xdmb.xyz/tcp.sh && bash tcp.sh
Select option 11: BBR+FQ
Copy
|
I recommend:
1
2
3
4
5
|
zouter->yinnet
DMIT->yinnet
IX->yinnet
YXVM->yinnet
Copy
|
Any of them are fine—its interconnect is so good that the HK relay choice barely matters. DMIT is the top recommendation: ultra‑low latency (~13ms) and near‑zero loss.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
DMIT test
16 packets transmitted, 16 received, 0% packet loss, time 15024ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.739/13.918/15.074/0.309 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 31.2 MBytes 262 Mbits/sec 0 956 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 778 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 964 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 20.0 MBytes 168 Mbits/sec 0 800 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 781 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 913 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 21.2 MBytes 178 Mbits/sec 0 1.02 MBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 18.8 MBytes 157 Mbits/sec 0 846 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 20.0 MBytes 168 Mbits/sec 0 1010 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 0 772 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 220 MBytes 185 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 209 MBytes 175 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 80.4 MBytes 675 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 89.3 MBytes 749 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 91.0 MBytes 763 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 83.4 MBytes 699 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 68.9 MBytes 578 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 81.0 MBytes 680 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 89.9 MBytes 754 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 87.8 MBytes 737 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 88.1 MBytes 739 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 90.6 MBytes 760 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 854 MBytes 715 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 850 MBytes 713 Mbits/sec receiver
Maxed out—this speed is insane.
Copy
|
United Kingdom#
yinnet has a new UK ISP VPS. Testing shows it’s pseudo‑residential. China Telecom/Unicom are barely usable; Mobile is unusable, so relay is recommended. International connectivity is good. IP quality is average with many flags; even IP2 marks it as VPN, which is a bit wild. General unlocks are okay, but EU‑specific streaming unlocks mostly fail. Hardware performance is average and IO is low.
Overall, not recommended. Poor value.
Configuration:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
UK Dual ISP | VPS ①
CPU: 1 core
Memory: 1GB
Disk: 10GB
Bandwidth: 200Mbps
Traffic: 1000GB
IP: 1 IPv4(Dual ISP)
DDoS Protection: None
Route: International
Available OS: Linux
USD 10.00 per month
30% off promo code: A4P2XHLRB7
Copy
|
Network Quality#
BGPtools query result
IPV4
Network quality test script result image
Nube.FR -> YINNET UK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
114 packets transmitted, 114 received, 0% packet loss, time 113132ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.011/11.204/11.806/0.132 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 233 MBytes 196 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 227 MBytes 190 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 264 MBytes 222 Mbits/sec 15728 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 261 MBytes 219 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
BWH.NL -> YINNET UK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
55 packets transmitted, 55 received, 0% packet loss, time 54087ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.789/9.928/10.140/0.083 ms
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 230 MBytes 193 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 227 MBytes 190 Mbits/sec receiver
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 264 MBytes 221 Mbits/sec 18710 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 261 MBytes 219 Mbits/sec receiver
Copy
|
International Connectivity Quality
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
|
======================================================
TCPping Test Results
======================================================
Service Avg(ms) Min(ms) Max(ms) Loss
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bing .70 0.453 1.651 0%
LinkedIn .78 0.428 4.727 0%
Microsoft .93 0.539 1.991 0%
Netlify 1.02 0.217 2.267 0%
Vercel 1.07 0.227 2.379 0%
Azure 1.17 1.089 1.294 0%
Steam 1.17 1.107 1.467 0%
Bloomberg 1.20 0.237 1.937 0%
Canva 1.21 0.808 2.556 0%
WSJ 1.24 0.862 2.341 0%
Coursera 1.27 0.863 2.424 0%
Trello 1.28 0.264 2.546 0%
Figma 1.35 0.825 2.434 0%
Dropbox 1.37 1.150 1.649 0%
AWS 1.38 1.056 2.500 0%
YahooMail 1.39 1.219 1.927 0%
Adobe 1.43 1.321 1.758 0%
KhanAcademy 1.43 0.188 2.516 0%
eBay 1.45 1.351 1.554 0%
edX 1.48 0.980 2.903 0%
Linode 1.55 1.475 1.684 0%
TikTok 1.57 1.458 1.698 0%
Vimeo 1.77 1.310 2.716 0%
Zoom 1.79 1.336 2.018 0%
NPM 1.80 1.344 2.615 0%
StackOverflow 1.80 1.355 2.381 0%
ChatGPT 1.81 1.377 2.418 0%
Cloudflare 1.81 1.356 2.441 0%
Gemini 1.81 1.690 1.956 0%
GitLab 1.81 1.361 2.506 0%
Notion 1.81 1.297 2.394 4.00%
GoogleCloud 1.82 1.461 2.130 0%
Shopify 1.82 1.293 2.519 0%
Copilot 1.83 1.322 2.652 0%
Medium 1.83 1.337 2.753 0%
Udemy 1.83 1.387 2.507 0%
Claude 1.84 1.303 2.706 0%
DigitalOcean 1.84 1.360 2.583 0%
DockerHub 1.84 1.394 2.426 0%
Midjourney 1.85 1.342 2.490 0%
Perplexity 1.85 1.366 2.690 0%
Snapchat 1.85 1.424 2.681 0%
DeepL 1.87 1.420 2.956 0%
Spotify 1.87 1.331 2.621 0%
Discord 1.88 1.324 2.883 0%
Coinbase 1.89 1.395 2.786 0%
GitHub 1.93 0.805 8.919 0%
Google 1.95 1.329 3.423 0%
YouTube 1.99 1.285 2.657 0%
Slack 2.07 1.495 2.599 0%
Gmail 2.24 1.393 2.960 0%
Akamai 2.65 1.393 12.202 0%
Twitter 3.24 1.385 14.933 0%
Walmart 3.28 1.123 8.724 0%
Wikipedia 6.98 6.403 8.506 0%
Dailymotion 7.69 6.558 8.613 0%
PayPal 9.38 1.719 14.920 0%
Apple 11.34 11.268 11.477 0%
Stripe 11.34 10.406 12.002 0%
Bitbucket 11.45 10.417 12.669 0%
Netflix 11.71 10.578 12.461 0%
DuckDuckGo 12.64 10.895 16.287 0%
PyPI 13.12 11.281 15.540 0%
Etsy 13.50 11.322 18.141 0%
Pinterest 13.50 11.339 15.549 0%
Fastly 13.51 11.299 15.019 0%
Twitch 13.65 11.313 15.020 0%
CNN 13.69 11.353 15.561 0%
Reddit 13.71 11.322 17.288 0%
NYTimes 13.85 11.348 16.039 0%
TheGuardian 13.93 11.336 14.950 0%
BBC 13.98 11.326 15.903 0%
Telegram 14.25 11.588 17.132 0%
ProtonMail 22.60 14.357 29.995 0%
AlJazeera 55.61 30.279 94.143 0%
Yandex 57.00 51.659 70.102 0%
Vultr 72.18 69.089 75.436 0%
EpicGames 79.50 77.532 82.990 0%
Amazon 80.56 78.243 83.656 0%
Facebook 90.17 1.034 138.328 0%
Reuters 100.76 99.390 103.342 0%
Outlook 105.48 78.075 152.332 0%
WhatsApp 116.58 1.093 138.172 0%
Xbox 121.53 9.833 260.807 0%
Oracle 131.78 129.057 142.805 0%
Salesforce 133.83 6.561 335.666 2.00%
Instagram 134.94 131.394 138.275 0%
Yahoo 147.34 91.916 214.133 0%
PlayStation 154.69 154.047 162.231 0%
AliExpress 166.02 161.196 170.977 0%
Bilibili 188.43 159.944 252.254 9.00%
WeChat 191.34 182.785 203.354 2.00%
Baidu 220.34 144.175 329.782 5.00%
Line 226.61 216.953 236.402 2.00%
Copy
|
IP Quality#
IPv4 Quality
IP quality test script result image
IP2Location test image
ipdata quality test image
Streaming Unlocks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
Test time: 2026-01-24 11:06:44
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Region Platforms ]============
Apple YES (Region: GBR)
BingSearch YES (Region: GB)
Claude YES
Dazn YES (Region: GB)
Disney+ YES (Region: GB)
Gemini YES (Region: GB)
GoogleSearch YES
Google Play Store YES (Region: GB)
IQiYi YES (Region: GB)
Instagram Licensed Audio YES
KOCOWA YES
MetaAI YES (Region: GB)
Netflix YES (Region: GB)
Netflix CDN GB
OneTrust YES (Region: GB ENGLAND)
ChatGPT YES (Region: GB)
Paramount+ YES
Amazon Prime Video YES (Region: GB)
Reddit YES
SonyLiv YES (Region: GB)
Sora YES (Region: GB)
Spotify Registration NO
Steam Store YES (Community Available) (Region: GB)
TVBAnywhere+ YES (Region: GB)
TikTok YES (Region: GB)
Viu.com YES
Wikipedia Editability YES
YouTube Region YES (Region: GB)
YouTube CDN LHR
---------------------TikTok unlock -- thanks to lmc999's original script---------------------
Tiktok Region: Failed
Copy
|
Detailed Streaming Unlocks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
|
** Testing IPv4 unlock status
--------------------------------
** Your network is: Wisdom Cloud Internet Technology Pte. (82.39.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: GB)
Disney+: Yes (Region: GB)
Netflix: Yes (Region: GB)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: GB)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: GB)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: GB [England]
iQyi Oversea Region: GB
Bing Region: GB (Risky)
Apple Region: GB
YouTube CDN: London
Netflix Preferred CDN: London
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United Kingdom
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: GBP
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: Yes
=======================================
===============[ Europe ]==============
Paramount+: Failed (Error: 406)
Discovery+: Yes (Region: GB)
SonyLiv: Yes (Region: GB)
HBO Max: No
SkyShowTime: No
BritBox: No
Rakuten TV: No
Megogo TV: Yes
Setanta Sports: No
MathsSpot Roblox: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR 1)
---GB---
HotStar: Yes (Region: GB)
Sky Go: Failed (Error: Unknown)
ITV Hub: Yes
Channel 4: Yes
Channel 5: Yes
BBC iPLAYER: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR)
Acorn TV: Yes
Shudder: Yes
---FR---
Canal+: Failed (Error: 404)
Molotov: No
---DE---
Joyn: No
SKY DE: No
ZDF: No
---NL---
NLZIET: Failed (Error: PAGE ERROR)
videoland: No
NPO Start Plus: Failed (Error: 401)
---ES---
Movistar+: No
---IT---
Rai Play: No
---CH---
SKY CH: No
---RU---
Amediateka: No
Copy
|
Common IP Databases Results
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Data is for reference only and is not 100% accurate. If the IP type differs, manually check multiple databases for comparison.
----------IP Quality Check -- based on oneclickvirt/securityCheck----------
IPV4 ASN : AS202736 Wisdom Cloud Internet Technology Pte. Ltd.
IPV4 Location : London / England / United Kingdom
IPV4 Active IPs : 7/256 (subnet /24)
--------------------------------------------------
Below are database IDs; outputs include the source ID in brackets.
ipinfo database [0] | scamalytics database [1] | virustotal database [2] | abuseipdb database [3] | ip2location database [4]
ip-api database [5] | ipwhois database [6] | ipregistry database [7] | ipdata database [8] | db-ip database [9]
ipapiis database [A] | ipapicom database [B] | bigdatacloud database [C] | dkly database [D] | ipqualityscore database [E]
ipintel database [F] | ipfighter database [G] | fraudlogix database [H] | cloudflare database [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (higher is better): 33 [8]
VPN Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Proxy Score (lower is better): 0 [8]
Community votes - harmless: 0 [2]
Community votes - malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (lower is better): 0 [E]
Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 [3]
ASNAbuse Score (lower is better): 0.0003 (Very Low) [A]
Company Abuse Score (lower is better): 0 (Very Low) [A]
Threat Level: low [9]
Traffic Mix: Human (higher is better)67% [I] Bot (lower is better)32% [I]
Blacklist record statistics (number of blacklist sites with records)::
Harmless records: 0 [2] Malicious records: 0 [2] Suspicious records: 0 [2] No-record count: 92 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: unknown [C] hosting [8 A] business [9] isp [0 3 7]
Company Type: business [7 A] isp [0]
Browser type: Mainstream89% Other10% [I]
Device type: Desktop82% Mobile17% Other0% [I]
OS type: Mainstream99% Other0% [I]
Cloud provider: No [7]
Datacenter: Yes [8 A] No [0 5 C G]
Mobile device: Yes [E] No [5 A C G]
Proxy: Yes [5 G] No [0 4 7 8 9 A C E]
VPN: Yes [7] No [0 A C E G]
TorExit: No [7]
Tor Exit: No [7]
Web crawler: No [9 A E]
Anonymous: Yes [7 8]
Attacker: No [7 8]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C E]
Threat: No [7 8 C]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C]
Bot: No [E]
DNS Blacklist: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 11(Blacklisted) 20(Other)
Google search availability: NO
----------Mail port check -- based on oneclickvirt/portchecker----------
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Copy
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
|
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 29 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
CPU cores : 1 @ 2799.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 926.1 MiB
Swap : 575.0 MiB
Disk : 11.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
VM Type : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : SkyQuantum Internet Service LLC
ASN : AS202736 WISDOM CLOUD INTERNET TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD.
Host : SkyQuantum Internet Service LLC
Location : London, England (ENG)
Country : United Kingdom
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 12.03 MB/s (3.0k) | 187.54 MB/s (2.9k)
Write | 12.03 MB/s (3.0k) | 188.52 MB/s (2.9k)
Total | 24.06 MB/s (6.0k) | 376.06 MB/s (5.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 205.35 MB/s (401) | 222.44 MB/s (217)
Write | 216.26 MB/s (422) | 237.25 MB/s (231)
Total | 421.62 MB/s (823) | 459.69 MB/s (448)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1044
Multi Core | 1028
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/24060258
curl: no URL specified!
curl: try 'curl --help' or 'curl --manual' for more information
SysBench CPU test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1-thread test (single-core) score: 1654 Scores
SysBench memory test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-thread read test: 43124.55 MB/s
Single-thread write test: 19861.91 MB/s
Copy
|
Summary#
Product Comparison
There are few competitors in Vietnam/South Korea/Japan/Taiwan, so I won’t do a detailed comparison here.
HK Region HGC Product Comparison
| Provider |
Price |
Specs |
Bandwidth |
Traffic |
IP Type |
Value Notes |
| yinnet |
$8/mo |
1c1g |
200Mbps |
1TB |
Dedicated IP |
Best value, ideal for individuals; 1TB is plenty |
| kazecloud |
$148/mo |
4c8g |
1000Mbps dedicated |
Unlimited |
Dedicated IP |
VDS‑class large machine; too expensive for individuals, suited for teams |
| bestvm |
$99.86/yr |
1c1g |
1000Mbps shared |
5TB |
Dedicated IP |
Best for heavy traffic (5TB); for light usage yinnet is cheaper |
| boil |
$7.88/mo |
1c1g |
1000Mbps shared |
2TB |
NAT IP (30 ports) |
Large port count, but shared IP depends on neighbors; less stable than dedicated IP |
US Pseudo‑residential Products Comparison
| Provider |
Price |
Specs |
Bandwidth |
Traffic |
Routing |
IP Type |
Value Notes |
| yunyoo |
$2.43/mo |
1c1g 10GB |
200Mbps |
500GB |
4837 |
Dedicated |
Cheapest, but half the traffic |
| yinnet |
$3.00/mo |
1c1g 10GB |
100Mbps |
1TB |
4837 |
Dedicated |
Enough traffic, reasonable price |
| zoro |
$3.71/mo |
1c1g (random) |
100‑200Mbps |
1TB |
9929 |
Dedicated |
Routing optimized, “blind box” configs |
| lisa |
$9.71/mo |
1c1g 20GB |
300Mbps |
3TB |
4837 |
Dedicated |
3x+ more expensive |
yinnet’s positioning is clear: a low‑price exit IP provider. If you need:
- Cheap HK/Vietnam true residential dedicated IP → highly recommended
- Good value TW interconnect → recommended (you probably don’t want to use HiNet direct with stuttering)
- Entry‑level United States pseudo‑residential → promo pricing is unbeatable
- High‑performance machine/direct use → not recommended
During Black Friday 50% off, HK true residential is $5/mo and Vietnam true residential is $6/mo—value is maxed out with virtually no competition. Even with regular 30%/20% codes, it remains a top value in its class.